(Download) "Griffith v. Security Ins. Co." by Supreme Court of Connecticut * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Griffith v. Security Ins. Co.
- Author : Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Release Date : January 14, 1975
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 60 KB
Description
This case arose from an accident in which the fifteen-year-old plaintiff, Richard Griffith, son of the plaintiffs Granville and Violet Griffith, was injured. The accident involved his bicycle and an uninsured automobile. At the time of the accident, there was in effect an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant to Granville Griffith. The plaintiffs applied to the Superior Court for an order directing the defendant company to proceed with arbitration in accordance with the provisions of 52-410 of the General Statutes and the decision of this court in Frager v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co., 155 Conn. 270, 231 A.2d 531. In their application, the plaintiffs alleged that by the [167 Conn. 452] terms of the insurance policy Richard was an insured and legally entitled to recover damages sustained as the result of the operation of an uninsured motor vehicle. By a more specific statement filed after the court had issued an order to the defendant to appear and show cause why the application should not be granted, the plaintiffs pleaded that at the time of the accident the home address of the plaintiffs, Richard Griffith and Violet Griffith. Was 93 Whiting Street, New Britain. The home address of the plaintiff, Granville Griffith, was primarily 450 Main Street, New Britain, and secondarily 93 Whiting Street, New Britain. The defendant company denied the allegation that Richard was an insured under the provisions of the policy issued to his father. By way of special defense, it pleaded that at all times covered by the complaint Granville Griffith resided at 450 Main Street, New Britain: that both Violet Griffith and Richard Griffith resided at 93 Whiting Street, New Britain; and that, since the plaintiff Granville and the plaintiffs Violet and Richard were not residents of the same household, the coverage extended under the subject insurance policy did not extend to the latter two plaintiffs After a hearing, the court rendered judgment ordering the defendant to arbitrate the questions covered under the arbitration clause of part IV of the policy issued to Granville Griffith.
 "Griffith v. Security Ins. Co." by Supreme Court of Connecticut * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free){kind=link}